Martin Smith, Buro Four (COMPETITION RUNNER-UP)
29 Jun 2022
2022 BCO Conference Photography Competition Winner | Leading Light Manchester
Martin Smith, Buro Four (COMPETITION RUNNER-UP)
7 Jun 2022
See you soon, Manchester!
|
1 Jun 2022
An introduction to the 2022 BCO NextGen Committee - North
Follow the BCO NextGen Committee on LinkedIn:
Amy Leech, tp bennett (Chair)Francesca Harrison, Ryder Architecture (Vice Chair)
Tom Giddings, Rider Levett Bucknall
Joseph Lazell, Atelier Ten
Danielle Ford, Dalbergia Group
James Thorneycroft, Arup
Jamie Risner, Arup
Molly Macaulay, Overbury Plc
Charlotte Wild, Bruntwood
Richard Mitchell, Savills
Emma Bramley, Cartwright Pickard Architects (photo coming soon).
27 May 2022
An introduction to the 2022 BCO NextGen Committee - Scotland
Follow the BCO NextGen Committee on LinkedIn:
20 May 2022
BCO Conference Photography Competition 2022 Judges
As an inclusive competition open to all BCO Conference attendees, from all disciplines and skill levels, this year we’ve made it easier than ever to enter, either via:
- Posting on Instagram with the hashtag #LeadingLightManchester
- Uploading to the official conference app (download the app to your phone to enter, remember to add your name).
- Or, by e-mailing your photo(s) to mail@bco.org.uk
Meet the esteemed panel behind the competition, as they share what they’ll be looking out for in your submissions:
Patricia de Isidoro, Architect & Artist, Sheppard Robson, Photography Competition Judging Chair

Having been recently appointed to the role of BCO president, Mark is well-placed to observe the great disruption and change that office life is going through. As such, he understands the need to re-think or re-set the office of the future – the focal point of this year’s conference.
For this year’s photography competition, Mark decided to put Manchester, a cosmopolitan modern powerhouse, in the spotlight with the ‘Leading Light Manchester’ theme. He hopes that participants will share their unique perspectives on the city’s architecture, vibrant arts and culture, and capture Manchester’s distinctive essence in their submissions.
“A pointer I would give to anyone thinking of taking part: Look for a unique angle in order to tell a story - go beyond the individual photograph in order to communicate Manchester’s relationship with space and time.”
Robin Brodie Cooper, Director, Gleeds, BCO, immediate past president
In his capacity as the BCO’s long-time Treasurer and previous president, Robin Brodie Cooper has built a deep understanding of the office industry. He has been with Gleeds for almost 35 years now and has risen to become an Equity Partner, holding numerous directorships within the company.
Focusing on the commercial aspects of the City of London, Robin has recently worked on delivering 52 Lime Street (also known as The Scalpel) and 10 Fen Court, celebrated for its rooftop public garden. Robin is the Honorary Treasurer of The City Architecture Forum.
While Covid disrupted the 2020 BCO Conference, Robin chaired a virtual – or partly virtual –conference later in the year which explored the future of the post-Covid workplace. A keen ‘Instaman’ himself, Robin has an appreciation for artistic still life photography and joins the panel this year eager to see which buildings entrants will select and how they take on the challenge of showcasing the structure’s most aesthetically pleasing parts.
Alex Lawlor, MRICS, Associate Director, Faithful + Gould

Alex Lawlor, an Associate Director at Faithful+Gould, works within the corporate real estate sector delivering office fit-out and refurbishment projects for clients and occupiers across London. With an array of nominations and accolades under her belt, she received the Atkins’ President's Award in 2018, was a finalist for BCO NextGen Rising Star L&SE in 2019, and was awarded the Faithful+Gould's Employee of the Year in 2019. Her diverse qualifications in project management, structural engineering and architecture, coupled with a personal interest in photography, make her the perfect panelist for this competition. She has a keen appreciation for creative design and an eye for detail.
Vasiliki Bowler, Senior Project Manager, Faithful + Gould

Giles took home the 1st place prize at the last BCO Conference photography competition with his winning entry of Maersk Tower whilst exploring the architectural views at the conference in Copenhagen. The 2019 panel praised his photograph’s composition, calling his entry ‘visually delicious.’
Take a look at some inspiration on Instagram:
18 May 2022
Networking | BCO NextGen Conference Drinks
|
13 May 2022
Circularity in practice – optimising the finite
Author: Oliver Hall, Make Architects
One of the most-quoted statistics on the impact of embodied carbon in
the built environment is that 80
percent of the buildings we’ll need by 2050 already exist. This provides a
clear rationale for the reuse and retrofit of existing buildings; however, as the
redevelopment of city office buildings continues at a rapid pace, there are
many examples where keeping existing buildings isn’t seen as a viable option –
whether that’s for financial, structural or various other reasons. This
conflict leads to fierce debate and friction between carbon and commercial aspirations
and priorities.
The principles
of circularity may provide a resolution to this debate. When viewed from a
circular mindset, existing buildings have much to offer, and by designing
adaptable, demountable structures, we have an opportunity to sustainably extend
the lifespan of buildings and their materials.
To further
understand and explore these opportunities, BCO Nextgen brought together a panel of industry experts working at the
forefront of circularity. These included Rachel Hoolahan (Sustainability
Coordinator at Orms), Steve Gilchrist
(Project Director at Grosvenor), Andrea Charlson (Commercial Manager and Built Environment Lead
at ReLondon), and Laura Batty (Structural
Engineer and Associate at Heyne
Tillett Steel).
Circular
design at all scales
Rachel Hoolahan set the challenge at Orms to aim for at
least one deep sustainability assignment on each project. This design-research
mentality is leading to innovation that unlocks circular economy opportunities.
During the panel discussions, she raised the challenges and questions brought to
light during the redevelopment of 160 Old Street, a
former Royal Mail sorting office.
The project achieved a 70 percent uplift in net internal
area through a reconfiguration and extension, while retaining 76 percent of the
existing structure, saving nearly 3,000 tons of CO2 emissions. The key challenge, however,
was ensuring the additional floorplates were flexible and of a high-quality, as
expected in a new building. Although the retention and extension of the
existing structure had the biggest carbon savings, it was in the selection,
specification and design of new elements that needed the most challenging. Hoolahan
gave the example of the ceramic sinks in the washrooms, which could be “easily
uninstalled, disassembled and reused in the future, [while opening] up the
opportunity to source reused sinks as the initial specification.”
While this is just one example of a ‘deep assignment’, by
implementing this circular mindset both at a large and small scale, the
materials and the building are ensured for long-term, flexible and sustainable
use.
Developers driving innovation
Grosvenor has been exploring circularity innovations across
several projects, both in terms of practical applications and the long-term
implications of them. They see materials reuse as an opportunity to balance
their materials across a range of sites. But as project director Steve
Gilchrist explained, circularity can be a wide-ranging topic, so you need to be
focused to create any meaningful change.
He explained that during a recent project, in collaboration
with Orms, Grosvenor paused the design to slow down and focus on the long-term
impact of the building. Steve said, “We want [the design team] to learn
about the building now, [and] think about how things could be done in the
future,” before rushing into the design. This thinking, combined with
Grosvenor’s ambition to explore the full process of implementing circularity,
meant the design team could engage with detailed building surveys and thoroughly
understand the materials within the building, and whether they could be reused.
The team also worked with lawyers on warranties, to ensure these ideas could be
implemented in a commercially sustainable way.
In demonstrating to supply chains that reusing materials
from existing building stock can be viable, Grosvenor are paving the way for
more detailed circular material models in future.
Creating a model for circularity
While the private sector is making tremendous progress, the
public sector is critical to the successful adoption of circular economy strategies
across the industry. ReLondon, a partnership between the Mayor of London and
the London boroughs, is on a mission to revolutionise London’s relationship
with products and waste. As Andrea Charlson put it, ReLondon are “helping
London waste less, reuse, recycle, repair and share more.”
One of ReLondon’s focus areas is the inclusion of circularity
in The
London Plan. The policy around reducing waste and supporting a
circular economy has four key elements; a requirement to collaborate, promote a
more circular economy, produce innovation, and adhere to targets around waste
diversion from landfill and reuse. However, the most significant element for
most large developments is the requirement for referrable schemes to submit a circular
economy statement as part of the planning process. Two of the most interesting components
of embedding circularity in the planning process is the need for a pre-demolition
audit – if the site’s being demolished or redevelopment – and the post-construction
requirements that show how a building can be adapted and reused in future. Where
this is implemented, it is expected that we’ll see a real-world reduction in the
use of virgin materials across the whole life of a project, leading to a
reduced carbon budget.
ReLondon is part of a consortium of 31 organisations across
4 cities (London, Copenhagen, Hamburg and the Helsinki region) who are working
together on the Horizon 2020-funded ‘Circular
Construction in Regenerative Cities’ (CIRCuIT) project.
Through the project, they are aiming to reduce the yearly consumption of virgin
raw materials by 20% in new construction, and show cost savings of 15% –
something that can only be achieved through collaboration. ReLondon are also trying to improve the
quantity of data available, and the accessibility of existing data, while
providing tools to access it – all of which will help ReLondon, and fellow
organisations, achieve this collective goal of reducing waste and carbon.
By pushing for policy change in the public sector, ReLondon
are steering the local industry, and indeed a global city, in the direction of
circularity.
Engrained disassembly
While the opportunity and scalability of circularity offers
the potential to revolutionise the construction industry and reduce our impact
on finite resources, there are also easy wins that all projects can, and must,
start actioning. Not every project will have a reusable structure, and not
every project team has access to a materials bank, but through early design
decisions, we can make new buildings easier to adapt, reuse and disassemble in
the future.
Laura Batty runs the internal research and development
department at Heyne Tillett Steel, where they’ve been exploring the principles
of circular design and disassembly on various projects, including their new
offices at 16
Chart Street. She says the opportunity to extend the lifespan
of the things we use is important, and by creating structures that are “designed
to be disassembled and reused at a higher possible value, [we are] eliminating
waste and pollution, avoiding things being designed to be thrown away, and
designing instead to facilitate reappropriation and recycling.” Designing structures
that can be disassembled using bolted connections and exposed steelwork, for
example, makes the process of disassembly more achievable when the building’s
functional life is over.
By factoring the end of a building’s life into its design,
we can redefine the life cycles of buildings and establish a framework for a
circular industry.
Conclusion
It’s clear from the panellists that circularity cannot be
achieved in isolation – it needs to be a collaborative process, between
internal teams, developers and designers, and the public and private sectors. Circularity
looks set to revolutionise the workplace life cycle and reduce the sector’s
impact on the environment, but only if everyone involved is willing to move
beyond the standard models of design, procurement and occupation, and shift
towards closing the loop instead.
We wish to thank our panellists for their unique, expert
perspectives on the challenges and opportunities of circularity in practice. To
listen to the full discussion, click the link here.










.png)
.png)







